Skip to main content

The Injustice Epidemic

Injustice Has Become An Epidemic.

Grassroots organizations are rising up all over the nation to combat this plague, which comes in many different forms. The Black Lives Matter movement is concerned with ending police brutality. The Occupy movement is exposing economic injustices. End Citizens United is purposed with getting money out of politics. People like Elon Musk and events such as the Climate Summit are stressing environmental issues in an effort to keep our planet sustainable. There’s a liberal whirlwind of activism out there.

What isn’t happening, at least not quickly enough, is a change in our overall attitudes. These movements represent a concern for the greater good. BLM activists aren’t troubled by excessive force being used against only people of color; they don’t want to see anyone beat down or shot to death by those who took oaths to protect them. Occupy activists are sometimes called the “Other 98%”; they’re calling for economic well-being of the vast majority, regardless of ethnicity, creed, or sexuality. Those who want to see the Supreme Court ruling in favor of Citizens United v. the FEC overturned are doing so in the name of real democracy for everyone, the relinquishment of influence by the 2%. And it goes without saying that environmental concerns affect every living being on this planet we all share.

But in this age of global communication and mobile internet access, which is allowing people from all walks of life to have open and uncensored dialogue, we’re also witnessing an amplification of the ego. You cannot peruse social media without bombardment of “selfies” and proliferation of “me, myself, and I.” We’ve been granted the ability to talk to each other, but we’ve chosen to talk about each other and ourselves. When a real issue is actually presented, more often than not it creates division and dissent; keyboard commandos operating with anonymity in the comment sections lambast other real-life people with insults and even threats of physical harm. Communication technology was supposed to help us advance as a civilization, yet it’s led to a concerning amount of incivility.

No man is an island; what our neighbors do has a direct impact on us as individuals. When we allow a major corporation to underpay their workers, we end up having to foot the bill. Case in point: Wal-Mart employees, people who work full-time jobs providing a service to the community, qualified for $6.2 billion dollars in government subsidy from tax-payers. The workers’ lives are worse, being degraded by having to accept a form of charity despite being a productive member of society. The customers’ lives are worse, having to pay for the goods from said corporation on one hand, then paying the sales and income taxes that are used to subsidize on the other hand. Furthermore, the goods themselves are mostly produced in slave-labor countries like China and those workers’ lives are worse for being exploited and abused. The federal government’s livelihood is also worse, having to allocate funds and resources to processing and distributing said subsidies, not to mention the local governments who entice the corporation into their communities with incentives in the form of tax breaks. When their presence no longer serves the needs of the company, they close down after running all the other small businesses out of town, leaving venerable grocery deserts in their wake. There’s only one entity in this equation who bears no repercussion for this entire debacle: Wal-Mart. The Walton family has seen their net worth increase exponentially, to an absurd degree; they now control a fortune equal to the wealth of the bottom 42% of Americans combined. This is the epitome of injustice, on so many levels.


So what can we do? Back to the problem of unchanging attitudes: Love thy neighbor. Listen to them, instead of merely tolerating their testimonial long enough to interject your own opinion. Consider their perspective, try to understand where they’re coming from; walk a mile in their shoes. Use your imagination in an effort to comprehend what it is they deal with on a day-to-day basis. Be open-minded to all ideas; you don’t have to change your mind, but hearing them out can have no adverse effect. Use deductive reasoning and critical thinking, do independent research as opposed to blindly accepting what mainstream media shoves down your throat. When something seems to be off-kilter, follow the money; find out who benefits from what’s wrong with the picture. Be kind, because it costs you nothing to do so and will actually make you feel better in the long run. Despite what our indoctrination tells us, life is not a competition; it’s a journey we’re all on with each other. Cast off prejudgments and predispositions, do away with absolutism; question traditional belief systems and only retain them if they work for you and your neighbor both. Work together, play together, live together; this world will become a better place through one methodology only: Togetherness. Together we can combat the myriad injustices, and only together can we defeat this epidemic.

 (As published by New American Journal)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Trekkian Utopia

Life isn't fair and it's not a perfect world. We have all known this to be true for about as long as we've understood pretty much anything. We've all experienced unfairness and had to accept it as a fact of life; we've all witnessed some grave injustices, at least second-hand. Each of us could write a long list of imperfections about this world and the society we've grown up in, and we all have opinions about how things could be better. If we allowed our wildest imaginations to conjure up a vision of utopia, what would it look like? Artists and philosophers and politicians have mused about this since the dawn of time; some have posed practical improvements, others more fantastical. One of the more inspiring visions was borne from the mind of a man named Gene Roddenberry. He dreamt of a future human civilization when we'd would go where no man had gone before; exploring the unending vastness of the cosmos—encountering new worlds and new civilizations...
Post a Comment
Read more

Political Ideology Primer

Since most of us were given little-to-no civics education in grade school and have been left to major media’s devices in order to differentiate between supposedly opposing political ideologies in current American terms, I thought I’d take a stab at condensing this overly-complicated and widely-misinformed subject into a more digestible foundation of definitions. The way I see it, all federal policy can be reasonably fit into one of three categories: economic, foreign, and domestic (civil/social). Within each of these categories exists an ideological spectrum with antithetical endpoints. For economic ideology, it’s the market forces of supply versus demand that define the ends of the spectrum; one either believes demand drives supply or vice versa, and approaches each economic policy decision from that perspective. I’ve written in detail about this subject here . Foreign policy exists on an interventionism/isolationism spectrum wherein nearly none of it rests entirely on eithe...
2 comments
Read more

An Overview of Macroeconomic History

Macroeconomic theory and economic policy are two wildly complicated fields of study, the latter even more compounded by its nasty habit of being written in confounding legalese. Most people hardly look into economics any further than how it most directly affects their personal finances, although everyone has an opinion on how taxes are collected and subsequently spent. But a basic understanding of how macroeconomic policy works is of the utmost importance when it comes to electing representatives who shape our socio-economic environment; the job of a governing body is to help guide how a market's causes, effects, and fluctuations affect its participants and the citizenry as a whole. While nuance may increase when going from fundamental theory to specific legislation, the approach to economic policy stems from really only two philosophies. The first believes that corporations and the wealthy are responsible for spurring economic growth through job creation and capital investmen...
4 comments
Read more